Publication Type
Journal Article
Version
acceptedVersion
Publication Date
3-2003
Abstract
This study addresses the effects of the provision of information on the reliability and validity of selection procedures and the effects of test-taker attitudes (i.e., belief in tests and comparative anxiety) on fairness perceptions. Prior to an actual selection process, applicants (N = 118) were given either information about the reliability and validity of various selection procedures or no information. Next, they evaluated the fairness of eight selection procedures. No significant effect of selection information was found. Belief in tests had significant effects, with applicants high on test belief giving higher fairness ratings than applicants low on test belief. In addition, an interaction effect between test belief and selection procedure was found. For example, test belief had larger effects on fairness for structured interviews, personality inventories, and cognitive ability tests. No significant effect of comparative anxiety on fairness was found.
Discipline
Human Resources Management | Industrial and Organizational Psychology | Organizational Behavior and Theory
Research Areas
Organisational Behaviour and Human Resources
Publication
International Journal of Selection and Assessment
Volume
11
Issue
1
First Page
67
Last Page
77
ISSN
0965-075X
Identifier
10.1111/1468-2389.00227
Publisher
Wiley: 24 months
Citation
LIEVENS, Filip; DE CORTE, Wilfried; and BRYSSE, Katrien.
Applicant perceptions of selection procedures: The role of selection information, belief in tests, and comparative anxiety. (2003). International Journal of Selection and Assessment. 11, (1), 67-77.
Available at: https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/5595
Copyright Owner and License
Authors
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 International License.
Additional URL
https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2389.00227
Included in
Human Resources Management Commons, Industrial and Organizational Psychology Commons, Organizational Behavior and Theory Commons