Publication Type
Journal Article
Version
acceptedVersion
Publication Date
9-2012
Abstract
Although the evidence for the use of situational judgment tests (SJTs) in high-stakes testing has been generally promising, questions have been raised regarding the potential coachability of SJTs. This study reports the first examination of the effects of coaching on SJT scores in an operational high-stakes setting. We contrast findings from a simple comparison of SJT scores for coached and uncoached participants (posttest only) with three different approaches to deal with the effects of self-selection into coaching programs, namely using a pretest as a covariate and using two different forms of propensity score-based matching using a wide range of variables as covariates. Coaching effects were estimated at about 0.5 SDs. The implications for the use of SJTs in high-stakes settings and for coaching research in general are discussed.
Discipline
Industrial and Organizational Psychology | Organizational Behavior and Theory
Research Areas
Organisational Behaviour and Human Resources
Publication
International Journal of Selection and Assessment
Volume
20
Issue
3
First Page
272
Last Page
282
ISSN
0965-075X
Identifier
10.1111/j.1468-2389.2012.00599.x
Publisher
Wiley: 24 months
Citation
LIEVENS, Filip; BUYSE, Tine; SACKETT, Paul R.; and CONNELLY, Brian S..
The effects of coaching on situational judgment tests in high-stakes selection. (2012). International Journal of Selection and Assessment. 20, (3), 272-282.
Available at: https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/5515
Copyright Owner and License
Authors
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 International License.
Additional URL
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2389.2012.00599.x
Included in
Industrial and Organizational Psychology Commons, Organizational Behavior and Theory Commons