Publication Type
Journal Article
Version
acceptedVersion
Publication Date
9-2011
Abstract
In high-stakes selection among candidates with considerable domain-specific knowledge and experience, investigations of whether high-fidelity simulations (assessment centers; ACs) have incremental validity over low-fidelity simulations (situational judgment tests; SJTs) are lacking. Therefore, this article integrates research on the validity of knowledge tests, low-fidelity simulations, and high-fidelity simulations in advanced-level high-stakes settings. A model and hypotheses of how these 3 predictors work in combination to predict job performance were developed. In a sample of 196 applicants, all 3 predictors were significantly related to job performance. Both the SJT and the AC had incremental validity over the knowledge test. Moreover, the AC had incremental validity over the SJT. Model tests showed that the SJT fully mediated the effects of declarative knowledge on job performance, whereas the AC partially mediated the effects of the SJT.
Keywords
Situational judgment tests, assessment centers, high-stakes selection, medical education
Discipline
Industrial and Organizational Psychology | Organizational Behavior and Theory
Research Areas
Organisational Behaviour and Human Resources
Publication
Journal of Applied Psychology
Volume
96
Issue
5
First Page
927
Last Page
940
ISSN
0021-9010
Identifier
10.1037/a0023496
Publisher
American Psychological Association
Citation
LIEVENS, Filip and PATTERSON, Fiona.
The validity and incremental validity of knowledge tests, low-fidelity simulations, and high-fidelity simulations for predicting job performance in advanced-level high-stakes selection. (2011). Journal of Applied Psychology. 96, (5), 927-940.
Available at: https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/5514
Copyright Owner and License
Authors
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 International License.
Additional URL
https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023496
Included in
Industrial and Organizational Psychology Commons, Organizational Behavior and Theory Commons