Publication Type
Journal Article
Version
acceptedVersion
Publication Date
3-2013
Abstract
This study contributes to the literature on why selection procedures that are based on the behavioral consistency logic (e. g., structured interviews and assessment centers) are valid predictors of job performance. We rely on interactionist theories to propose that individual differences in assessing situational demands explain true variance in performance in selection procedures and on the job. Results from 124 individuals in a simulated selection process showed that the assessment of situational demands was related to both selection and job performance. Individual differences in assessing situational demands also contributed to the criterion-related validity of assessment center and structured interview ratings, offering a complementary explanation as to why selection procedures based on the notion of behavioral consistency predict job performance.
Keywords
behavioral consistency;job performance;employment interview;assessment center;assessment of situational demands
Discipline
Industrial and Organizational Psychology | Organizational Behavior and Theory
Research Areas
Organisational Behaviour and Human Resources
Publication
Journal of Applied Psychology
Volume
98
Issue
2
First Page
326
Last Page
341
ISSN
0021-9010
Identifier
10.1037/a0031257
Publisher
American Psychological Association
Citation
JANSEN, Anne; MELCHERS, Klaus G.; LIEVENS, Filip; KLEINMANN, Martin; BRANDLI, Michael; FRAEFEL, Laura; and KONIG, Cornelius J..
Situation assessment as an ignored factor in the behavioral consistency paradigm underlying the validity of personnel selection procedures. (2013). Journal of Applied Psychology. 98, (2), 326-341.
Available at: https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/5504
Copyright Owner and License
Authors
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 International License.
Additional URL
https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031257
Included in
Industrial and Organizational Psychology Commons, Organizational Behavior and Theory Commons