Publication Type
Journal Article
Version
acceptedVersion
Publication Date
4-2016
Abstract
Recent management research has indicated the importance of family, sleep, and recreation as nonwork activities of employees. Drawing from entrainment theory, we develop an expanded model of work-life conflict to contend that macrolevel business cycles influence the amount of time employees spend on both work and nonwork activities. Focusing solely on working adults, we test this model in a large nationally representative dataset from the Bureau of Labor Statistics that spans an 8-year period, which includes the “Great Recession” from 2007 through 2009. We find that during economic booms, employees work more and therefore spend less time with family, sleeping, and recreating. In contrast, in recessionary economies, employees spend less time working and therefore more time with family, sleeping, and recreating. Thus, we extend the theory on time-based work-to-family conflict, showing that there are potential personal and relational benefits for employees in recessionary economies.
Keywords
business cycles, recovery activities, sleep, work-family conflict, work-life conflict
Discipline
Human Resources Management | Organizational Behavior and Theory
Research Areas
Organisational Behaviour and Human Resources
Publication
Journal of Occupational Health Psychology
Volume
21
Issue
2
First Page
235
Last Page
249
ISSN
1076-8998
Identifier
10.1037/a0039896
Publisher
American Psychological Association
Citation
BARNES, Christopher M.; LEFTER, Alexandru; Devasheesh P. BHAVE; and WAGNER, David Turley.
The benefits of bad economies: Business cycles and time-based work-life conflict. (2016). Journal of Occupational Health Psychology. 21, (2), 235-249.
Available at: https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/4988
Copyright Owner and License
Authors
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 International License.
Additional URL
https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039896