What's wrong with rights?
Publication Type
Working Paper
Publication Date
2012
Abstract
We investigate a failure cost hypothesis of equity flotation mechanism choice, in which the expected failure cost of non-underwritten rights offerings influences the underwriting decision. Although issuers can, in theory, completely self-insure these offerings with a sufficiently low subscription price, we find evidence consistent with constraints in subscription price-setting - subscription price signals project quality, and the propensity to underwrite is decreasing in expected overall takeup. We also find that firm ownership concentration is inversely related to the likelihood of underwriting only because of its positive relation with subscription precommitment, a supplementary insurance mechanism. These results support the failure cost hypothesis as a potential explanation for the rights issue paradox.
Keywords
Rights, Paradox, Failure, Seasoned equity offerings
Discipline
Finance and Financial Management
Research Areas
Finance
Identifier
10.2139/ssrn.1698626
Citation
Duong, Truong; Singh, Rajdeep; and TAN, Eng Joo.
What's wrong with rights?. (2012).
Available at: https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/3284
Comments
Received revise-and-resubmit decision at the Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis