Publication Type
Journal Article
Version
acceptedVersion
Publication Date
8-2009
Abstract
In this essay, Steven Burik discusses Jacques Derrida's position with regard to the place of education in philosophy within the university system, and then relates these thoughts to comparative philosophy. Philosophers find themselves constantly having to defend philosophy and the importance of teaching philosophy against pressure from the powers that be. Burik contends that the argument Derrida set forth to "protect" philosophy entails a double bind: Derrida emphasized the value and importance of philosophical thinking while at the same time criticizing the limits of philosophy, both self-mandated and externally imposed. Derrida's defense of philosophy was anything but a protection of the status quo, according to Burik. Derrida ultimately argued that the teaching of philosophy and philosophy itself should be inherently open to new developments. Burik relates Derrida's defense of philosophy and attack on mainstream philosophy to comparative philosophy, demonstrating that both argue for an expansion of thinking beyond the narrow Western confines of philosophy as "pure" reason or rationality by showing how alterity always inserts itself, and that both seek to give this alterity a valid place in educational systems. © 2009 Board of Trustees | University of Illinois.
Discipline
Education | Philosophy
Research Areas
Humanities
Publication
Educational Theory
Volume
59
Issue
3
First Page
297
Last Page
312
ISSN
0013-2004
Identifier
10.1111/j.1741-5446.2009.00320.x
Publisher
Wiley: 6 months
Citation
BURIK, Steven.(2009). Opening philosophy to the world: Derrida and education in philosophy. Educational Theory, 59(3), 297-312.
Available at: https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soss_research/2484
Copyright Owner and License
Authors
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 International License.
Additional URL
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-5446.2009.00320.x