Supreme court practice directions (amendment no. 1 of 2016): A significant step in further incorporating ADR into the civil justice process

Author

Dorcas QUEK ANDERSON, Singapore Management UniversityFollow

Publication Type

Magazine Article

Publication Date

3-2016

Abstract

The Supreme Court Practice Directions were amended in January to introduce severalchanges concerning the use of AlternativeDispute Resolution (ADR) in resolving SupremeCourt civil cases.1 These amendments represent a significant shift in the Judiciary’sencouragementofthelegalprofessiontoroutinely consider theuseofADR

Keywords

ADR, Supreme Court Practice Directions, ADR Offer

Discipline

Civil Law | Courts

Research Areas

Dispute Resolution

Publication

Singapore Law Gazette

ISSN

1019-942X

Publisher

Butterworths

Citation

QUEK ANDERSON, Dorcas. Supreme court practice directions (amendment no. 1 of 2016): A significant step in further incorporating ADR into the civil justice process. (2016). Singapore Law Gazette.
Available at: https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research_smu/85

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 International License.