Specific performance availability, executed consideration, and the principle of Holroyd v Marshall
Publication Type
Journal Article
Publication Date
2-2025
Abstract
The principle originating from a speech of Lord Westbury's in 'Holroyd v Marshall' provides: where future property has purportedly been presently assigned, equity shall regard as done that which ought to be done by imposing a constructive trust on the future property when it materialises and is future no more, such that no further steps need be taken by the assignor or the assignee to effect the assignment. This article will examine, more precisely, the sense in which Lord Westbury appeared to qualify the principle of 'Holroyd v Marshall' as entailing a contract of which specific performance might be available. This article will also demonstrate that various suggestions that the principle is further qualified in that it only applies in cases where executed consideration had been given for the purported present assignment, are doubtful.
Keywords
Equitable assignment, future property, specific performance, consideration, Holroyd v Marshall
Discipline
Estates and Trusts | Property Law and Real Estate
Research Areas
Private Law
Publication
Journal of Equity
Volume
18
First Page
165
Last Page
192
ISSN
1833-2137
Publisher
LexisNexis
Citation
THAM, Chee Ho.
Specific performance availability, executed consideration, and the principle of Holroyd v Marshall. (2025). Journal of Equity. 18, 165-192.
Available at: https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/4851
Copyright Owner and License
Author