Publication Type

Journal Article

Version

acceptedVersion

Publication Date

3-2026

Abstract

Most studies take a unitary state-centric approach to assessing China’s relationship with international economic law. In contrast, we provide a more nuanced approach that assesses variation in China’s engagement. We examine the role of different Chinese state and non-state actors, considering their interests, ideological frames, institutional contexts, and relation to state power. We illustrate our analytic framework by examining China’s response to and engagement with international dispute settlement systems in three areas: international commercial arbitration, international trade dispute settlement, and investor–state arbitration. Our approach is important for global cooperation in discrete policy areas so that the West does not ‘other’ China in simplistic, binary terms.

Discipline

International Law | International Relations

Research Areas

Corporate, Finance and Securities Law

Areas of Excellence

Growth in Asia

Publication

Journal of International Economic Law

Volume

29

Issue

1

First Page

118

Last Page

144

ISSN

1369-3034

Identifier

10.1093/jiel/jgag003

Publisher

Oxford University Press

Additional URL

https://doi.org/10.1093/jiel/jgag003

Share

COinS