Publication Type
Journal Article
Version
publishedVersion
Publication Date
2-2025
Abstract
Large language models (LLMs) such as GPT-4 have been creatively harnessed in the conflict resolution arena as dialogue agents interacting with humans within negotiations, due to their capacity for in-context learning and giving human-like responses. In light of the burgeoning use of LLMs in conflict resolution training, a pilot study was conducted to ascertain the desirability of using dialogue agents built on GPT-4 in conducting simulations for students learning negotiation skills. This article discusses insights gained from the study on the reliability of LLM agents in following prompts for negotiation simulations; notable negotiation behaviour of the LLM agent; the degree to which learning objectives are achieved; and how closely the LLM agent’s responses resemble human behaviour. It further offers reflections on appropriate ways to harness LLM agents in future conflict resolution training.
Keywords
large language model, generative AI, GPT-4, negotiation, conflict resolution
Discipline
Artificial Intelligence and Robotics | Dispute Resolution and Arbitration | Science and Technology Law
Research Areas
Dispute Resolution
Publication
Australasian Dispute Resolution Journal
Volume
33
Issue
3
First Page
157
Last Page
177
ISSN
1441-7847
Identifier
10.3316/informit.T2025060100008000475951305
Publisher
Thomson Reuters (Professional)
Citation
Dorcas QUEK ANDERSON.
Negotiating with GPT-4: Digital doormat or skilful counterpart?. (2025). Australasian Dispute Resolution Journal. 33, (3), 157-177.
Available at: https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/4655
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 International License.
Additional URL
https://search.informit.org/doi/10.3316/informit.T2025060100008000475951305
Included in
Artificial Intelligence and Robotics Commons, Dispute Resolution and Arbitration Commons, Science and Technology Law Commons