Publication Type

Journal Article

Version

publishedVersion

Publication Date

1-2025

Abstract

In recent times, Malaysian courts have resorted to a ritual incantation of unconscionability and the notion of a remedial constructive trust to justify a declaration of a constructive trust. This methodology is unhelpful for approaching constructive trusts and has led the law to develop in an unprincipled and unpredictable fashion. Our central thesis is that the key Malaysian decisions could have been decided on the basis of pre-existing legal principles upon which English and Commonwealth courts have declared a constructive trust. We argue that future courts ought to realign their methodology with the orthodox tradition of incremental development of the law in this area instead of resorting to broad notions of unconscionability and the remedial constructive trust.

Discipline

Asian Studies | Estates and Trusts

Research Areas

Private Law

Publication

Asian Journal of Comparative Law

First Page

1

Last Page

15

ISSN

2194-6078

Identifier

10.1017/asjcl.2025.8

Publisher

Cambridge University Press

Copyright Owner and License

Authors-CC-BY

Creative Commons License

Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

Additional URL

https://doi.org/10.1017/als.2024.22

Share

COinS