Publication Type
Journal Article
Version
publishedVersion
Publication Date
11-2020
Abstract
This article considers the enforcement mechanism for international mediated settlement agreements proposed by the Singapore Convention on Mediation and critically examines this mode of enforcement as against enforcement as an arbitral award in Asia, including through a hybrid process like Arb-Med-Arb. Similarities and differences between the New York Convention and the Singapore Convention on Mediation will be discussed and used to consider how Asian jurisdictions may respond to the Singapore Convention on Mediation and what lessons may be learnt from the arbitration context.
Keywords
Arbitration, Mediation, New York Convention, Singapore Convention on Mediation, International dispute resolution
Discipline
Asian Studies | Dispute Resolution and Arbitration
Research Areas
Dispute Resolution
Publication
Asian International Arbitration Journal
Volume
16
Issue
2
First Page
113
Last Page
138
ISSN
1574-3330
Publisher
Aspen Publishers Inc.
Embargo Period
5-31-2021
Citation
CHUA, Eunice.
The Singapore Convention on Mediation and the New York Convention on Arbitration: Comparing enforcement mechanisms and drawing lessons for Asia. (2020). Asian International Arbitration Journal. 16, (2), 113-138.
Available at: https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/4644
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 International License.
Additional URL
https://kluwerlawonline.com/journalarticle/Asian+International+Arbitration+Journal/16.2/AIAJ2020018
