Publication Type

Journal Article

Version

publishedVersion

Publication Date

1-2021

Abstract

The use of a general framework in the determination of a duty of care has seemingly fallen out of favour following the UK Supreme Court’s decision in Robinson. Relying on the example of the Spandeck framework in Singaporean jurisprudence, this piece presents the argument that such frameworks, being consistent with a relational conception of tort law, can provide a useful means of determining whether a duty of care exists. In so doing, this piece addresses some criticisms of the relational view and re-emphasises the important role the duty of care plays in the tort of negligence.

Keywords

Tort, negligence, corrective justice, duty of care, Spandeck

Discipline

Asian Studies | Torts

Publication

Cambridge Law Review

Volume

18

Issue

1

Last Page

263

ISSN

2753-5746

Publisher

Cambridge University Law Society

Copyright Owner and License

Authors

Share

COinS