Publication Type
Journal Article
Version
submittedVersion
Publication Date
12-2023
Abstract
It is often assumed and taken for granted that there is a gulf separating the fair use and fair dealing doctrines in copyright law arising principally from the ‘open v closed’ distinction that is made of the statutory schemes in the respective fair use and fair dealing jurisdictions.It will be argued in this article, after a comparative and comprehensive study of the case law and of the various (overlapping) fairness factors, that this distinction merely reflects a difference as to legislative form, rather than the substance of the fairness analysis that may ultimately bear on the outcome of a fairness determination.Both doctrines, in actuality, are far more aligned than may be immediately apparent and this is where having recourse to US fair use jurisprudence—including the infamous transformative use doctrine—in appropriate cases may well assist in a court’s assessment of fairness in the fair dealing context.
Discipline
Intellectual Property Law
Publication
Journal of Intellectual Property Law and Practice
Volume
18
Issue
12
First Page
848
Last Page
866
ISSN
1747-1532
Identifier
10.1093/jiplp/jpad096
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP): Policy F - Oxford Open Option C
Citation
SAW, Cheng Lim.
Distinguishing the fair use and fair dealing doctrines in copyright law—much ado about nothing?. (2023). Journal of Intellectual Property Law and Practice. 18, (12), 848-866.
Available at: https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/4366
Copyright Owner and License
Authors
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 International License.
Additional URL
https://doi.org/10.1093/jiplp/jpad096