Publication Type

Transcript

Version

publishedVersion

Publication Date

6-2023

Abstract

An application was made under s 95 of the Legal Profession Act to set aside a penalty imposed by the Council of the Law Society. The Court of Appeal held that an appeal lay to the Appellate Division of the High Court, and not the Court of Appeal, because this was not a “case relating to constitutional or administrative law”. The reasoning is problematic: it relied on an overly narrow conception of “public powers”, conflated judicial review with administrative law more broadly, erroneously considered the merits of the application as relevant to the “which court” question, and overlooked the similarities between the present application and a typical application for judicial review. This note proposes a more detailed definition of “constitutional or administrative law”, and presents further, more fundamental proposals for reform to prevent excessive satellite litigation and allocate appeals more efficiently.

Keywords

constitutional law, administrative law, civil appeals, Singapore, public-private divide, civil procedure, appeals

Discipline

Dispute Resolution and Arbitration

Research Areas

Public Interest Law, Community and Social Justice; Dispute Resolution; Asian and Comparative Legal Systems; Public Law

Publication

Singapore Academy of Law Journal

First Page

1

Last Page

18

ISSN

0218-2009

Publisher

Singapore Academy of Law

Share

COinS