Publication Type
Journal Article
Version
publishedVersion
Publication Date
1-1992
Abstract
While there has been no paucity of theoretical discussion on the law of contract,’ there has, in English law at least, been little clear evidence from the courts themselves which particular jurisprudential approach is favoured.2 This is not surprising, given the rather formal nature of the English legal system.’ Herein, perhaps, lies a clue - that English law in general and its contract law in particular are generally oriented towards so-called ‘black letter law’; or, to be more precise, that the generally favoured conception of law is that of po~itivism.~ Asalready mentioned, however, there has been little express acknowledgement of this approach by the courts. This is why two important cases decided by the Court of Appeal5 merit consideration. Each of these decisions has had (for the time being at least)6 a profound influence upon its own particular area of the English common law of contract. The first, Kleinwort Benson Ltd v Malaysia Mining Corp Bhd,’ concerned the legal effect of a specific clause in a letter of comfort; the second, Bunk oflvova Scotia v Hellenic Mutual War Risks Association (Bermuda) Ltd, The Good Luck,a was a lengthy judgment that not only traversed many complex points relating to the law of insurance as well as the relationship between tort and contract, but also contained very significant pronouncements upon the contractual implication of terms, the latter of which constitutes the focus of the instant comment.
Discipline
Contracts
Research Areas
Corporate, Finance and Securities Law
Publication
Modern Law Review
Volume
55
Issue
1
First Page
102
Last Page
111
ISSN
0026-7961
Identifier
10.1111/j.1468-2230.1992.tb01865.x
Publisher
Wiley: 6 months
Citation
PHANG, Andrew B.L..
Positivism in the English law of contract. (1992). Modern Law Review. 55, (1), 102-111.
Available at: https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/4174
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 International License.
Additional URL
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2230.1992.tb01865.x