Publication Type
Journal Article
Version
acceptedVersion
Publication Date
1-2004
Abstract
What is the status of a right to vote in the Indian legal system? Is the right a constitutional/fundamental right? Or is it simply a statutory right? Contrary to the decisions of the Supreme Court in the last five decades, this paper argues that the right to vote is a constitutional right: its textual foundation may be located in Article 326. And, in this sense, the Supreme Court has erred in construing the right to vote as a statutory right under the Representation of Peoples Act, 1951. Interpreting the right to vote as a statutory right has larger implications for the nature of Indian democracy. If the Court is correct is construing the right as a statutory one, it would follow that democracy may be extinguished by a simple amendment of the Representation of Peoples Act. Under the Court's current jurisprudence, that which could not be achieved by a constitutional amendment may now be achieved by an amendment of an ordinary statute.
Keywords
Constitutional rights, Democracy, Voting, Legal system, Courts, India
Discipline
Asian Studies | Constitutional Law | Law and Politics | Public Law and Legal Theory
Research Areas
Public Interest Law, Community and Social Justice
Publication
Public Law
First Page
704
Last Page
711
ISSN
0033-3565
Publisher
Sweet and Maxwell
Embargo Period
3-29-2022
Citation
DAM, Shubhankar.
Peoples Union for Civil Liberties v Union of India: Is Indian democracy dependent on a statute?. (2004). Public Law. 704-711.
Available at: https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/3904
Copyright Owner and License
Authors
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 International License.
Included in
Asian Studies Commons, Constitutional Law Commons, Law and Politics Commons, Public Law and Legal Theory Commons