Exit, Stage 2, for the plaintiff in service out of jurisdiction?: Oro Negro Drilling Pte Ltd v Integradora de Servicios Petroleros Oro Negro SAPI de CV [2020] 1 SLR 226
Publication Type
Transcript
Publication Date
9-2021
Abstract
In Oro Negro Drilling Pte Ltd v Integradora de Servicios Petroleros Oro Negro SAPI de CV [2020] 1 SLR 226, the Singapore Court of Appeal in an observation cast doubt on the legal possibility of the plaintiff obtaining leave for service out of jurisdiction where Singapore is not the natural forum but substantial injustice would result from trial in the clearly more appropriate foreign court. This is part of Stage 2 of the traditional test in Spiliada Maritime Corp v Cansulex Ltd [1987] AC 460 that has informed the exercise of jurisdiction of the Singapore court for many years. This note argues that the doubt is unfounded.
Keywords
conflict of laws, private international law, jurisdiction, service out of jurisdiction, access to justice
Discipline
Asian Studies | Dispute Resolution and Arbitration | Jurisdiction
Research Areas
Private Law
Publication
Singapore Academy of Law Journal
Volume
33
Issue
2
First Page
1237
Last Page
1251
ISSN
0218-2009
Publisher
Singapore Academy of Law
Citation
YEO, Tiong Min.
Exit, Stage 2, for the plaintiff in service out of jurisdiction?: Oro Negro Drilling Pte Ltd v Integradora de Servicios Petroleros Oro Negro SAPI de CV [2020] 1 SLR 226. (2021). Singapore Academy of Law Journal. 33, (2), 1237-1251.
Available at: https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/3735