Publication Type

Journal Article

Version

acceptedVersion

Publication Date

2-2021

Abstract

As digital goods gain traction and technological advancements that enable and facilitate piracy develop, technological protection measures (‘TPMs’) have become indispensable tools for content-producers to safeguard their intellectual property (‘IP’) rights. Like other intellectual property laws, there is an inherent tension in TPM protection provisions between safeguarding the content-producers’ IP rights and the consumers’ collective legitimate right to access works. TPM protection may be overly broad in two major ways. Firstly, by an inefficacious transposition of the rights and authority requirements, which stems from Article 11 of the WIPO Copyright Treaty. Secondly, by an overly-broad protection of TPMs in domestic legislation. This article argues that circumventing TPMs should only be prohibited where this would also involve an infringement of existing IP rights. The first part of the article discusses the proper ambit of TPM protection provisions by comparing the scope of such laws in Australia and Singapore, concluding that the Singapore position effectively protects the content-producer’s IP rights without extending the de facto enforceability of TPM rights. The second part considers the practical implications of TPMs, including how they affect parallel imports and related practices such as geoblocking, virtual private networks (‘VPNs’) and streaming.

Keywords

Technological protection measures, Comparative law, international treaties

Discipline

Asian Studies | Science and Technology Policy

Research Areas

Innovation, Technology and the Law

Publication

International Review of Law, Computers and Technology

Volume

35

Issue

3

First Page

270

Last Page

287

ISSN

1360-0869

Identifier

10.1080/13600869.2021.1879594

Publisher

Taylor & Francis

Copyright Owner and License

Authors

Additional URL

https://doi.org/10.1080/13600869.2021.1879594

Download

Share

COinS