Publication Type
Journal Article
Version
acceptedVersion
Publication Date
9-2021
Abstract
The WTO dispute settlement system is in crisis due to the persistent blockage of the appointment of Appellate Body members by the United States. This paper reviews the US criticisms against the Appellate Body and argues that its allegations are unfounded and its approach is wrong. To deal with the US blockage, various proposals have been made, with the most popular being the Multiparty Interim Appeal Arbitration Arrangement (MPIA) set up by several key Members including the European Union and China. After a thorough analysis of the key features of the MPIA from both theoretical and practical perspectives, this paper argues that the MPIA fails to provide a proper solution to the Appellate Body crisis due to its many defects. Instead, the paper suggests the appointment of Appellate Body members based on majority voting at the General Council. This paper concludes by noting that only such a rule-based solution can not only solve the current Appellate Body crisis but also deter similar attempts to sabotage the WTO dispute settlement system in the future.
Discipline
International Trade Law | Law and Economics
Publication
Journal of International Economic Law
Volume
24
Issue
3
First Page
534
Last Page
550
ISSN
1369-3034
Identifier
10.1093/jiel/jgab031
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP): Policy E - Oxford Open Option D
Citation
GAO, Henry S..
Finding a rule-based solution to the appellate body crisis: Looking beyond the multiparty interim appeal arbitration arrangement. (2021). Journal of International Economic Law. 24, (3), 534-550.
Available at: https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/3461
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 International License.