Publication Type

Journal Article

Version

publishedVersion

Publication Date

10-2022

Abstract

Described as the crisis of our generation, the coronavirus pandemic has had a profound effect on consumption behaviour, in turn devastating businesses globally. Marking a departure from the sanctity of contract and causing perceived incursions to accrued legal rights, the Coronavirus Act 2020 and related legislation provide business tenancies protection, among others, against forfeiture for non-payment of rent. While this regulation of commercial tenancies appears to be justified on the basis of pragmatic utility, I suggest that Honoré’s incident of ownership prohibiting harmful use also allows for these emergency laws to be vindicated from a property perspective. This provides an overarching ethical basis to provide guidance when property rights can be statutorily affected.

Keywords

Law and Regulation, Property theory, Covid-19

Discipline

Property Law and Real Estate | Public Health

Research Areas

Private Law

Publication

Statute Law Review

Volume

43

Issue

3

First Page

284

Last Page

303

ISSN

0144-3593

Identifier

10.1093/slr/hmab018

Publisher

Oxford University Press

Copyright Owner and License

Authors

Additional URL

https://doi.org/10.1093/slr/hmab018

Share

COinS