An analysis of judicial restraint in the doctrine of substantive legitimate expectations in the UK and Hong Kong

Publication Type

Journal Article

Publication Date

8-2021

Abstract

The substantive legitimate expectations doctrine has become a fixed feature in the judicial review landscape of the United Kingdom and Hong Kong. Yet judges in other common law jurisdictions have expressed reservations about the doctrine in view of its potential to intrude into the merits of decision-making and elevate individual interests over legitimate administrative objectives. This article will investigate how the judges in the United Kingdom and Hong Kong have addressed such concerns by highlighting the legal control techniques they have used to restrain the application of the doctrine, as well as the factual circumstances that trigger such restraint. It will argue that while analytical ambi- guities exist in the relationship between these factual circumstances and the control techniques they trigger, these ambiguities present further opportunities to shape the doctrine to address the concern of merits review and promote more principled judicial decision-making.

Discipline

Asian Studies | Public Law and Legal Theory

Research Areas

Asian and Comparative Legal Systems

Publication

Hong Kong Law Journal

Volume

51

Issue

2

First Page

467

Last Page

490

ISSN

0378-0600

Publisher

Hong Kong Law Journal Ltd.

This document is currently not available here.

Share

COinS