Publication Type
Case note/Digest
Version
acceptedVersion
Publication Date
3-2021
Abstract
Wee Teng Yau represents the first case on tax avoidance by professionals to come before the Supreme Court. This note attempts to reconcile the judgments of the High Court and the Income Tax Board of Review, which both made findings that the taxpayer had engaged in tax avoidance, but which approached the case rather differently on some points. Apart from a clear rejection of the “personal exertion” principle as having no legal basis under Singapore law, it appears that the common conclusion is that professionals incorporating a company would not constitute tax avoidance in itself, but if this was coupled with the paying of an artificially low level of remuneration to the same practicing professional, this might well constitute tax avoidance.
Keywords
Tax Law, Tax Avoidance, GAAR
Discipline
Asian Studies | Tax Law
Research Areas
Corporate, Finance and Securities Law
Publication
Singapore Journal of Legal Studies
First Page
1
Last Page
11
ISSN
0218-2173
Publisher
National University of Singapore
Citation
OOI, Vincent.
Tax avoidance by professionals: Where are we with Wee Teng Yau?. (2021). Singapore Journal of Legal Studies. 1-11.
Available at: https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/3361
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 International License.