Publication Type
Journal Article
Version
acceptedVersion
Publication Date
7-2018
Abstract
The advent of the Singapore International Commercial Court (SICC) and the enactment of the Hague Convention on Choice of Court Agreements 2005 (the Hague Convention) in Singapore presents an intriguing case study of the issues raised by the co-mingling of the rules of an international convention, jurisdictional rules for an international commercial court, and traditional common law jurisdictional principles within the private international law and procedural rules of a single national jurisdiction. This article highlights several key issues raised by the interaction between the SICC, Hague Convention, and common law jurisdictional rules, and proposes solutions to streamline these three sets of rules into a coherent and principled body of law. In addition, this article examines the experience of the Dubai International Financial Centre Court to elucidate lessons for the development of the SICC’s jurisdictional rules.
Keywords
private international law, conflict of laws, Singapore International Commercial Court
Discipline
Courts | International Law
Research Areas
Corporate, Finance and Securities Law
Publication
Civil Justice Quarterly
Volume
37
Issue
1
First Page
124
Last Page
147
ISSN
0261-9261
Publisher
Sweet and Maxwell
Embargo Period
5-3-2021
Citation
CHNG, Wei Yao, Kenny.
The impact of the Singapore International Commercial Court and Hague Convention on choice of court agreements on Singapore’s private international law. (2018). Civil Justice Quarterly. 37, (1), 124-147.
Available at: https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/3260
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 International License.
Additional URL
https://ssrn.com/abstract=3038583