Publication Type

Journal Article

Version

publishedVersion

Publication Date

12-2020

Abstract

When confronted with the question of whether to admit similiar fact for criminal cases, courts in Singapore are often faced with balancing potentially competing norms in the form of evidential expediency and fairness to the accused. Specifically, although similiar fact may help establish the ingredients of an offence, there existis a real risk that any resulting conviction of the accused and this potential weakness in inferential reasoning through indirect proof will - to use the word in its broadest sense - predjudice the accused.

Discipline

Asian Studies | Criminal Law

Research Areas

Innovation, Technology and the Law

Publication

Singapore Academy of Law Practitioner

First Page

1

Last Page

18

ISSN

2661-4855

Publisher

Singapore Academy of Law

City or Country

Singapore

Embargo Period

5-4-2021

Copyright Owner and License

Authors

Additional URL

https://journalsonline.academypublishing.org.sg/Journals/SAL-Practitioner/Crime/ctl/eFirstSALPDFJournalView/mid/593/ArticleId/1558/Citation/JournalsOnlinePDF

Share

COinS