Publication Type

Journal Article

Version

acceptedVersion

Publication Date

3-2019

Abstract

This article presents findings from an empirical network analysis of citation practices in Singapore’s highest court. A network of all 987 reported Court of Appeal judgments handed down from 2000 to 2017 is constructed. Network centrality algorithms are used to rank judgments by centrality. Judgments on contract law, particularly on contractual interpretation and terms, emerge as the most central. Based on this, this article argues that more attention can be paid to interpretation per se as a legal skill. More generally, this article establishes a framework for applying network analysis to Singapore jurisprudence on a larger scale.

Keywords

Singapore Legal System, Citations Network Analysis, Computational Legal Studies

Discipline

Asian Studies | Comparative and Foreign Law | Courts

Research Areas

Legal Theory, Ethics and Legal Education

Publication

Singapore Academy of Law Journal

Volume

31

First Page

246

Last Page

284

ISSN

0218-2009

Publisher

Singapore Academy of Law

Copyright Owner and License

Authors

Share

COinS