Publication Type

Journal Article

Version

publishedVersion

Publication Date

1-2002

Abstract

The experience of Chinese Taipei shows that opening up a previously protected market to new entrants can be a more effective and reliable way to enhance competition than regulating the behavior of dominant or monopolistic firms. Moreover, when opening up the market, the liberalizing measures adopted by government should be market-structure-neutral. That is, it should not try to dictate the direction and results of market competition. A more pressure-resistant mechanism should be designed to deal with market power, taking the form of a regime that is cross-sector, independent and collective in its decision-making, such as has been the case with Chinese Taipei's Fair Trade Commission.

Keywords

Cable TV, Competition law, Market power, Merger, Telecommunications

Discipline

Asian Studies | Communications Law | Communication Technology and New Media

Research Areas

Innovation, Technology and the Law

Publication

Review of Industrial Organization

Volume

21

Issue

2

First Page

129

Last Page

143

ISSN

0889-938X

Identifier

10.1023/A:1019669309809

Publisher

Springer (part of Springer Nature): Springer Open Choice Hybrid Journals

Additional URL

https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019669309809

Share

COinS