Determining the parties’ true choice of the seat of arbitration and lex arbitri

Publication Type

Book Chapter

Publication Date

3-2010

Abstract

The selection of a seat of arbitration or the place of arbitration is sometimes not as straightforward as it seems. Because the seat of arbitration prima facie determines the law governing the conduct of the arbitration (also known as the “lex arbitri” or the “curial law”) thereby affecting the rights and liabilities of the parties, potential room for argument arises when that selection is not made with due care and precision. Three types (at least) of ambiguities may arise:(a) when there is ambiguity in the choice of the seat designated by the parties;(b) when the parties have designated a seat but have also chosen a lex arbitri different from that of the seat; and(c) when there is ambiguity in whether the domestic or the international arbitration regime within the designated seat should apply.The significance for counsel and clients is that the lex arbitri may turn out to be not what they had intended. The profound legal and practical implications attached to the seat of arbitration calls for practitioners to be aware of these pitfalls in designating a seat of arbitration. This article discusses the case law to illustrate different courts’ approach in resolving the three types of ambiguities outlined above.

Discipline

Dispute Resolution and Arbitration

Research Areas

Dispute Resolution

Publication

Between East and West: Essays in Honour of Ulf Franke

Editor

Kaj Hobér; Annette Magnusson; Marie Öhrström

ISBN

978-1-933833-59-0

Publisher

Juris Publishing

City or Country

Sweden

Additional URL

https://arbitrationlaw.com/library/determining-parties-true-choice-seat-arbitration-and-lex-arbitri-chapter-18-between-east-and

This document is currently not available here.

Share

COinS