Publication Type

Journal Article

Version

publishedVersion

Publication Date

1-2020

Abstract

Abuse, exploitation and neglect of adults raise complex issues on the freedom of the individual to choose for themselves versus the powers of the State to intervene. The law has traditionally limited the scope of compulsory intervention to extreme situations only which can frustrate social workers who deal with such cases. On the other hand, it would be unacceptable to allow intervention simply because it is assessed to be in the adults’ best interests. A balance therefore has to be struck between autonomy and protection. This paper examines how Singapore’s Vulnerable Adults Act identifies the point for intervention and embodies safeguards to prevent abuse of the State’s powers.

Keywords

Elder abuse, elder law, vulnerable adults

Discipline

Asian Studies | Elder Law | Gerontology

Research Areas

Public Interest Law, Community and Social Justice

Publication

Elder Law Review

Volume

12

First Page

1

Last Page

17

ISSN

1045-7437

Publisher

University of Western Sydney

Copyright Owner and License

Authors

Comments

The article is a republication (with minor amendments) of Tackling Elder Abuse: State Intervention under Singapore’s Vulnerable Adults Act (January 2019) (Discussion Paper No. 17, Center for Asian Legal Exchange, Nagoya University).

Share

COinS