Publication Type

Journal Article

Version

publishedVersion

Publication Date

1-2019

Abstract

This case note discusses the Singapore High Court case of UKM, in which an order was granted to a gay man to adopt his biological son conceived through a gestational surrogacy arrangement in the United States. In particular, the High Court’s assessment of the welfare of the child and of public policy, in light of two factors—the prohibition of male homosexual acts in section 377A of the Penal Code and the de facto curtailment of domestic surrogacy by Singapore’s restrictive rules relating to the use of assisted reproduction technology services—will be examined.

Discipline

Asian Studies | Law and Society | Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility

Research Areas

Legal Theory, Ethics and Legal Education

Publication

Singapore Journal of Legal Studies

Volume

19

First Page

263

Last Page

273

ISSN

0218-2173

Publisher

National University of Singapore

Additional URL

https://law.nus.edu.sg/sjls/articles/SJLS-Mar-19-263.pdf

Share

COinS