Publication Type

Journal Article

Version

acceptedVersion

Publication Date

4-2019

Abstract

This article examines the burgeoning trend of creating court ODR systems, focusing on the design aspects that are likely to raise ethical challenges. It discusses four salient questions to be considered when designing a court ODR system, and the resulting ethical tensions that are brought to the fore. As a fourth party, the ODR system not only replaces existing court functions, but enlarges the scope of the courts’ intervention in disputes and increases the courts’ interface with the user. Furthermore, certain ethical principles such as transparency, accountability, impartiality and fairness take on greater significance in the court context than in private ODR, because of the association of the courts with substantive and procedural justice. As in any dispute resolution system, a coherent and effective court ODR system should be guided by dispute system design principles, which includes having clarity of the system’s underlying values and purposes. It is therefore pertinent for each court to resolve the key ethical tensions in order to articulate the foundational values that will undergird the design of its ODR system.

Keywords

court ODR, fourth party, ethics, access to justice, confidentiality, transparency, informed participation, accessibility, accountability, empowerment, trust

Discipline

Dispute Resolution and Arbitration | Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility

Research Areas

Innovation, Technology and the Law; Dispute Resolution

Publication

International Journal of Online Dispute Resolution

Volume

5

Issue

1-2

First Page

20

Last Page

38

Identifier

10.5553/IJODR/235250022018005102004

Copyright Owner and License

Eleven International Publishing

Additional URL

https://doi.org/10.5553/IJODR/235250022018005102004

Download

Share

COinS