Publication Type
Journal Article
Version
publishedVersion
Publication Date
11-2018
Abstract
This article explores the limitsof the principle of non-interference and examine situations where the courtshave overridden the discretion of the trustee and compelled the trustee to actin a particular manner. While there havebeen numerous instances where the courts have avoided the trustee’s act, thecases where the courts have actually compelled a trustee to exercise a power ina particular manner are relatively few. The thesis of this article is that amore helpful way to conceptualise the philosophy behind the judicial control ofa trustee’s discretion is not to say that the court is bound by a so-calledprinciple of non-interference; rather, the contention made here is that it ismore accurate to say that the courts will interfere if the trustee has abusedhis or her discretion. The advantage of statingthe rule in a positive form is that it makes it clear that the trustee’sdiscretion is not uncontrolled and the courts may interfere with the exerciseof the discretion in appropriate cases.
Discipline
Comparative and Foreign Law | Estates and Trusts
Research Areas
Private Law
Publication
Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Rechtswissenschaft
Volume
117
Issue
3
First Page
303
Last Page
317
Citation
TANG, Hang Wu.
Compelling trustees to exercise their discretion: A principle of non-intervention?. (2018). Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Rechtswissenschaft. 117, (3), 303-317.
Available at: https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/2856
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 International License.