Publication Type
Blog Post
Version
publishedVersion
Publication Date
11-2018
Abstract
In October, we reported on a recent case from the Singapore High Court: Chan Gek Yong v Violet Netto. In that post, we examined the High Court’s attitude towards parties who have had a change of heart after agreeing to conclude a Mediated Settlement Agreement (‘MSA’) and wish to challenge its validity. Last month we focused on one of the plaintiff’s (Mdm Chan) allegations, namely that the co-mediators put pressure on her to sign the MSA. As readers will recall, the High Court found there was no evidence to substantiate this claim. However this was not Mdm Chan’s only argument!
Discipline
Dispute Resolution and Arbitration
Research Areas
Dispute Resolution
Publisher
IEEE
Citation
ALEXANDER, Nadja and CHONG, Shou Yu.
Singapore Case Note Part 2: What happens when a party to a mediated settlement agreement has a change of heart?. (2018).
Available at: https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/2833
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 International License.
Additional URL
http://mediationblog.kluwerarbitration.com/2018/11/17/singapore-case-note-part-2-what-happens-when-a-party-to-a-mediated-settlement-agreement-has-a-change-of-heart/