Publication Type

Case note/Digest

Version

publishedVersion

Publication Date

11-2014

Abstract

Can a company recover the value of the bribe from a director who has paid the bribe, on behalf of the company, to a third party to secure certain benefits for the company, and where it is not alleged that the director had personally benefitted from the bribe? This question raises several complex issues relating to directors’ standard of care, corporate authorisation and corporate illegality, which were considered by the recent decision of the Singapore Court of Appeal in Ho Kang Peng v Scintronix Corp (formerly known as TTL Holdings).

Keywords

Company law, bribe, directors' duties, illegality, authorisation

Discipline

Asian Studies | Business Organizations Law | Commercial Law

Research Areas

Corporate, Finance and Securities Law

Publication

Lloyd's Maritime and Commercial Law Quarterly

Volume

[2014]

Issue

4

First Page

477

Last Page

480

ISSN

0306-2945

Publisher

Informa

Embargo Period

12-17-2018

Copyright Owner and License

Publisher

Additional URL

https://www.i-law.com/ilaw/doc/view.htm?id=349545

Share

COinS