Publication Type

Journal Article

Version

publishedVersion

Publication Date

9-2018

Abstract

This article aims to establish that Singapore’s drug policy and approach though not in tandem, is consistent with the elements espoused in the harm reduction approach advocated by the Global Commission on drug policies. The Commission takes the position that drug control nationally has to be aligned with the sustainable development goals agenda approved by the member states in 2015. It has recommended abolishing death penalty for all drug related offences, decriminalizing drug possession and cultivation for personal consumption, implementing non-penal sanctions for all low level drug offenders, and exploring non-penal regulatory models following decriminalization. There is a paradigm shift in global attitude towards drug problem. Traditionally, there appears to be two distinct approaches to drug issues: The so-called harm reduction and the harm eradication approach. This paper anchors upon this basic principle of categorization to offer a comparative analysis between the harm reduction approach used in Europe and the harm eradication approach used in Singapore. It argues that Singapore’s approach though labelled as one of harm eradication has strong preponderance of the harm reduction elements in rehabilitation, treatment and reintegration of the drug inmates in the Singapore correctional facility. This analysis challenges the traditional classification and provides new ways of making sense of the variances in drug approach given jurisdictional, geographical and cultural nuances. Concomitantly, it recommends having a specialized drug court within the Singapore criminal justice system to augment its harm reduction approach.

Keywords

Harm Reduction Approach, Harm Eradication Approach, Decriminalization, Alternatives to Punishment, Drug Courts, Drug Philosophy

Discipline

Asian Studies | Criminal Procedure | Food and Drug Law | International Law

Research Areas

Asian and Comparative Legal Systems

Publication

Beijing Law Review

Volume

9

Issue

3

First Page

439

Last Page

459

ISSN

2159-4627

Identifier

10.4236/blr.2018.93027

Publisher

Scientific Research Publishing

Copyright Owner and License

Author

Additional URL

https://doi.org/10.4236/blr.2018.93027

Download

Share

COinS