Publication Type
Journal Article
Version
publishedVersion
Publication Date
1-2018
Abstract
What do Cadbury, Toblerone and Kit-Kat chocolates, the Rubik’s Cube and Lego mini-figurine toys, Louboutin shoes, Bottega Veneta bags and London Taxi Company cabs all have in common? These products have been, along with several others, protagonists of the rising trend of registering shapes and other non-traditional trademarks in a variety of countries, and then, in several cases, protagonist of ensuing litigation addressing the validity of these marks. To a large extent, the review panels and the courts involved in these cases have declared several of these marks invalid or have reduced their scope considerably. Hence, these cases have often involved several degrees of litigation and have been heralded in the news. In some instances, the courts have also upheld the validity of non-traditional marks and the possibility to register these signs, for example, with respect to the registrability of the décor of the Apple Store.
Discipline
Intellectual Property Law
Publication
International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law
Volume
49
Issue
1
First Page
1
Last Page
4
ISSN
0018-9855
Identifier
10.1007/s40319-017-0667-x
Publisher
Max-Planck-Institut für Immaterialgüter- und Wettbewerbsrecht
Citation
CALBOLI, Irene.
Chocolate, fashion, toys and cabs: The misunderstood distinctiveness of non-traditional trademarks. (2018). International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law. 49, (1), 1-4.
Available at: https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/2590
Copyright Owner and License
Author
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 International License.
Additional URL
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40319-017-0667-x