Third parties’ liability for receipt of misapplied corporate assets: The relevance of knowing receipt?

Publication Type

Journal Article

Publication Date

12-2017

Abstract

Thisarticle argues that there are three conceptual difficulties with applying thedoctrine of knowing receipt to cases of receipt of misdirected corporateassets. First, the extension of the doctrine from the trust context to thecorporate context is under explored. It appears to be based on a trust analogybut the analogy is imperfect. Second, many of the cases concern adirector/corporate agent acting without authority. Nevertheless, case law hasyet to fully examine the difficult relationship between want of authority,contractual validity, breach of duty and beneficial receipt. As for the caseswhere the contract is valid but the corporate agent has nonetheless acted inbreach of duty, the contract provides a good justification for the recipient toretain the benefit. Finally, the fundamental differences between the trustframework and the corporate framework justify different forms of protection tobe extended to the beneficiary in each context.

Keywords

knowing receipt, director, company, fiduciary, trust, equity

Discipline

Business Organizations Law | Commercial Law

Research Areas

Private Law

Publication

Journal of Equity

Volume

11

Issue

3

First Page

293

Last Page

318

ISSN

1833-2137

Publisher

LexisNexis

This document is currently not available here.

Share

COinS