Publication Type
Journal Article
Version
publishedVersion
Publication Date
7-2012
Abstract
The proposed Regulation for a Common European Sales Law (CESL),1 unveiled on 11 October 2011, marks the opening legislative salvo on the future of European contract law. Besides critique from private lawyers on the substantive content therein,2 the legality of the CESL under Union law may be called into question.3 The CESL cites Article 114 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) as its legal basis." In so doing, it goes against the grain of received wisdom: virtually all the studies on the subject ruled out the use of Article 114 TFEU in favour of Article 352 TFEU insofar as the chosen vehicle is an optional instrument.5
Keywords
European contract law, optional instrument, legal basis, harmonization
Discipline
Contracts | European Law
Research Areas
Asian and Comparative Legal Systems
Publication
Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law
Volume
19
Issue
1
First Page
132
Last Page
147
ISSN
1023-263X
Identifier
10.1177/1023263X1201900111
Publisher
SAGE Publications (UK and US)
Citation
LOW, Gary.
Unitas via Diversitas. Can the common European sales law harmonize through diversity?. (2012). Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law. 19, (1), 132-147.
Available at: https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/2550
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 International License.
Additional URL
https://doi.org/10.1177/1023263X1201900111