Publication Type

Journal Article

Version

publishedVersion

Publication Date

12-2017

Abstract

Singapore hasrecently amended its Consumer Protection (Fair Trading) Act in response to calls for tougher action against unscrupulous traders. The revisions were aimed at strengthening the government’s ability to deter and punish errant traders, witha focus on deterrence. To this end, the government introduced new investigatory powers, enhanced court powers and added one substantive consumer remedy. Despite this, the authors argue that Singapore’s consumer protection regime remains inadequate because: unfair practices have yet to attract criminalsanctions; no guidelines were issued to provide transparency and clarity on how the broad investigatory powers and harsher court powers are to be implemented; no measures to encourage reform were introduced; and consumer remedies remain insufficient. In this article, the revisions are discussed with a comparison tothe Hong Kong and Australian regimes. Suggestions for further reform are then made for the purpose of achieving a more robust and comprehensive consumer protection regime.

Keywords

Consumer protection, Unfair practice, Comparative law, Consumer Protection (Fair Trading) Act, Hong Kong Trade Descriptions Ordinance, Australian Competition and Consumer Act, Australian Consumer Law, Consumer remedies, Voluntary compliance, Deterrence, Reform, Guidelines, Injunctions, Investigatory powers, Criminal sanctions, Civil pecuniary penalties

Discipline

Asian Studies | Consumer Protection Law | International Trade Law

Research Areas

Private Law

Publication

University of Tasmania Law Review

Volume

36

Issue

2

First Page

15

Last Page

48

ISSN

0082-2108

Publisher

University of Tasmania Law School

Download

Share

COinS