Publication Type
Journal Article
Version
publishedVersion
Publication Date
11-2017
Abstract
The subject of a doctor’s duty of care to his patient, especially as regards the giving of advice, is a controversial one. In recent times, the courts and the medical professions in several jurisdictions have given their varying responses. In the Hii Chii Kok case, the Singapore Court of Appeal was faced with the difficult challenge of whether to and, if so, how to change the law. The judgment is as complex as it is important.
Discipline
Asian Studies | Medical Jurisprudence | Torts
Research Areas
Private Law
Publication
Tort Law Review
Volume
25
Issue
2
First Page
79
Last Page
91
ISSN
1039-3285
Publisher
Thomson Reuters (Professional)
Citation
LOW, Kee Yang.
Doctor's duty of disclosure and the Singapore Court of Appeal decision in Hii Chii Kok: Montgomery transformed. (2017). Tort Law Review. 25, (2), 79-91.
Available at: https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/2504
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 International License.
Included in
Asian Studies Commons, Medical Jurisprudence Commons, Torts Commons