Publication Type
Magazine Article
Version
acceptedVersion
Publication Date
9-2011
Abstract
In this article, I expand on the literature and present a meta-model for thinking about mediation practice. The Mediation Meta-Model is a structure for identifying different mediation approaches and how they relate to one other. It makes no claim to universal application. Rather, it offers a conceptual road-map for an increasingly complex and sophisticated array of practices which share the name mediation. The theoretical foundations and analysis for the Meta-Model have been included in previous work (2008).It is well known in Australian mediation circles that mediation practice does not always correspond to the dominant facilitative training model—even though, on the face of it, the formal accreditation of mediators might suggest otherwise. In 2003 judicial attention was drawn to non-facilitative mediation practices in the case of Tapoohi v Lewenberg. The case demonstrated that differences in mediator styles matter as an issue of professional practice.
Keywords
Mediation, models, Australia, mediator styles
Discipline
Dispute Resolution and Arbitration
Research Areas
Dispute Resolution
Publication
ADR Bulletin: The Monthly Newsletter on Dispute Resolution
Volume
12
Issue
6
First Page
126
Last Page
131
ISSN
1440-4540
Publisher
Bond University
Citation
ALEXANDER, Nadja.
The mediation meta-model: The realities of mediation practice. (2011). ADR Bulletin: The Monthly Newsletter on Dispute Resolution. 12, (6), 126-131.
Available at: https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/1884
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 International License.
Additional URL
http://epublications.bond.edu.au/adr/vol12/iss6/5/