Facilitative versus Evaluative Mediation: Is there Necessarily a Dichotomy?
Publication Type
Journal Article
Publication Date
1-2013
Abstract
This paper examines the origin of the distinction between facilitative and evaluative mediation, and the subsequent debate concerning the use of evaluative mediation. The paper questions the apparent dichotomy between the two styles of mediation, and suggests that the common meaning attributed to these terms may have detracted mediators from a meaningful consideration of mediation styles and techniques. The author also offers her own perspective on how to navigate this "dichotomy".
Keywords
Alternative Dispute Resolution, Dispute Resolution
Discipline
Dispute Resolution and Arbitration
Research Areas
Dispute Resolution
Publication
Asian Journal on Mediation
Volume
[2013]
First Page
66
Last Page
75
ISSN
1793-2173
Citation
QUEK ANDERSON, Dorcas.
Facilitative versus Evaluative Mediation: Is there Necessarily a Dichotomy?. (2013). Asian Journal on Mediation. [2013], 66-75.
Available at: https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/1750