Mandatory Mediation: An Oxymoron? Examining the Feasibility of Implementing a Court-Mandated Mediation Program
Publication Type
Journal Article
Publication Date
6-2010
Abstract
Since the introduction of the "multi-door courthouse" concept at the Pound Conference, court-annexed mediation programs have been established in increasing number. The courts' increasing association with mediation programs begs the question of whether they should compel disputing parties to attempt mediation, especially in jurisdictions where mediation has not been widely utilized. This paper examines the current debate iconcerning court-mandated mediation and evaluates other jurisdictions' approaches. The author uses a "continuum of mandatoriness" to analyse the differing levels of compulsion, and argues that mandatory mediation only becomes a cause for concern in certain situations along the continuum. The paper recommends ways to design the program in a way that does not impinge upon the parties' autonomy within mediation.
Keywords
Alternative dispute resolution, courts
Discipline
Dispute Resolution and Arbitration
Research Areas
Dispute Resolution
Publication
Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution
Volume
11
Issue
2
First Page
479
Last Page
509
ISSN
6416-2862
Publisher
Yeshiva University, Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law
Citation
QUEK ANDERSON, Dorcas.
Mandatory Mediation: An Oxymoron? Examining the Feasibility of Implementing a Court-Mandated Mediation Program. (2010). Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution. 11, (2), 479-509.
Available at: https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/1749