Constraint or Restraint? Singapore's Constitution at 50
Publication Type
Book Chapter
Publication Date
6-2016
Abstract
The Singapore Constitution, together with the nation, turns 50 in 2015. This chapter focuses on the Constitution's intended role as a constraint on the exercise of power of the political branches of the government - the executive and the legislature. The judiciary has the responsibility to ensure that the political branches act in accordance with the Constitution, including the fundamental liberties guaranteed to individuals therein. Yet only a handful of applications for judicial review have had some measure of success. In other cases, the courts have shown great restraint in striking down governmental action and legislation as unconstitutional. I explore why there seems to be such reluctance by the judiciary to play a fuller part in assessing whether the political branches have traversed the limits set by the Constitution. The courts appear to have a very modest conception of their role, rather than vindicating individual rights, they seem to find it more appropriate to defer to the prior policy choices of the political branches.
Keywords
constitutional law, deference, judicial review, Singapore
Discipline
Asian Studies | Constitutional Law
Publication
Singapore: Negotiating State and Society, 1965-2015
Editor
Lim, Jason Lim; Lee, Terence
First Page
15
Last Page
34
ISBN
9781138998629
Publisher
Routledge
City or Country
Abingdon, Oxon
Citation
LEE, Jack Tsen-Ta.
Constraint or Restraint? Singapore's Constitution at 50. (2016). Singapore: Negotiating State and Society, 1965-2015. 15-34.
Available at: https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/1726
Additional URL
http://worldcat.org/isbn/9781138998629