The contagion reputational effects of failed individual audit partners: Evidence from an audit client market
Publication Type
Journal Article
Publication Date
2-2023
Abstract
Prior research using individual auditor data shows that the stock market punishes the clients of failed auditors but not those of nonfailed auditors in the same tainted office (e.g., Li, Qi, Tian, and Zhang 2017). In this study, using audit client market share, we find similar results, but, more importantly, we document that the nonfailed partners’ client market shares decrease when they lack a track record to infer their audit quality credentials and when they reveal connections through teamwork experience with failed audit partners. In other words, nonfailed auditors in the same tainted office suffer contagion loss if there are no mitigating circumstances, such as a good track record or dissociation with failed auditors. These findings are novel in the literature and contribute to the empirical evidence for contagion effects in an individual partner reputational environment.
Keywords
audit partner, failed auditors, auditor reputation, auditor turnover
Discipline
Accounting
Research Areas
Corporate Governance, Auditing and Risk Management; Corporate Reporting and Disclosure; Financial Performance Analysis
Publication
Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory
Volume
42
Issue
1
First Page
53
Last Page
74
ISSN
0278-0380
Identifier
10.2308/AJPT-19-128
Publisher
American Accounting Association
Citation
GUL, A. Ferdinand; LIM, Chee Yeow; WANG, Kun; and XU, Yanping.
The contagion reputational effects of failed individual audit partners: Evidence from an audit client market. (2023). Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory. 42, (1), 53-74.
Available at: https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soa_research/2106
Additional URL
https://doi.org/10.2308/AJPT-19-128