Publication Type

Journal Article

Version

acceptedVersion

Publication Date

6-2020

Abstract

We examine the impact of China’s anti-corruption campaign on firm-level financial reporting quality (FRQ). As an important component of the anti-corruption campaign, in October 2013, “Rule 18” was issued to prohibit party and government officials from serving as directors for publicly listed firms. The regulation led to a large number of official directors resigning from their roles as directors involuntarily. As such, Rule 18 has effectively weakened, if not fullydiscontinued, the political connections of the firms that previously hired officials as directors. Our empirical analyses employ a difference-in-differences research design with firm fixed effects and PSM to examine the pre- and post- period FRQ around the enactment of Rule 18. We find that, compared to propensity-score-matched control firms, FRQ of firms with resigned officialdirector increases after Rule 18. Further evidence suggests that the impact is stronger when firms are located in regions with more developed financial markets and in regions with higher judiciary efficiency. We also find that the effect is more pronounced when firms are non-state-owned, received preferential credits, and face refinancing pressure.

Keywords

Anti-Corruption Campaign, Financial Reporting Quality, Political Connections, China, Quasi Experiment

Discipline

Accounting | Asian Studies | Finance and Financial Management

Research Areas

Corporate Reporting and Disclosure

Publication

Contemporary Accounting Research

Volume

37

Issue

2

First Page

1015

Last Page

1043

ISSN

0823-9150

Identifier

10.1111/1911-3846.12557

Publisher

Wiley

Copyright Owner and License

Authors

Additional URL

https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12557

Download

Share

COinS