Publication Type
Journal Article
Publication Date
3-2018
Abstract
The usefulness of the CEO-to-employee pay ratio disclosure to investors is subject to significant debate. Our experiment examines participant responses to higher-than-industry and comparable-to-industry pay ratio disclosures in a company. A prior experiment by Kelly and Seow (2016) (hereafter KS) found that incrementally disclosing a higher-than-industry pay ratio on top of higher-than-industry CEO pay had indirect negative effects on the company’s perceived investment potential, via negative perceptions about the fairness of the CEO pay and workplace climate. We find that the negative indirect effects of pay ratio disclosures on perceived investment potential in KS are replicable in our study, and for a less extreme comparable-to-industry pay ratio. We do not find evidence that the effects of incremental pay ratio disclosure on investor perceptions are stronger when the pay ratio is higher-than-industry than when it is comparable-to-industry. Our study suggests that the ability of pay ratio disclosures to impact investor perceptions extends across a range of pay ratios.
Keywords
CEO compensation disclosure, CEO-to-employee pay ratio, investor perceptions
Discipline
Accounting | Industrial Organization
Research Areas
Corporate Governance, Auditing and Risk Management
Publication
Management Accounting Research
Volume
38
First Page
51
Last Page
58
ISSN
1044-5005
Identifier
10.1016/j.mar.2017.09.002
Publisher
Elsevier: 24 months
Citation
KELLY, Khim and SEOW, Jean Lin.
Research note: Investor perceptions of comparable-to-industry versus higher-than-industry pay ratio disclosures. (2018). Management Accounting Research. 38, 51-58.
Available at: https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soa_research/1761
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 International License.
Additional URL
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2017.09.002