Publication Type
Journal Article
Version
acceptedVersion
Publication Date
3-2016
Abstract
Although macroeconomic news has a major impact on corporate earnings, anecdotal evidence suggests that financial analyst research is inefficient with respect to such news. Examining analysts' earnings research, we find that they underreact to negative macroeconomic news. Analysts are not all equal, though, as analysts employed at the same firm as an active macroeconomist underreact much less. We find that the benefit of analyst access to an economist is concentrated in firms that are high in cyclicality relative to their industry, high in cyclicality in general, and that are smaller in size. In addition, analysts who are exposed to more accurate or award winning in-house macroeconomists benefit more. Investors appear to recognize the advantage of access to macroeconomists, reacting more strongly to these analysts' forecast revisions. Overall, our results suggest that the presence of an active in-house macroeconomist improves the efficiency and credibility of analyst research.
Keywords
sell-side analyst, forecast optimism, macroeconomist, GDP, price efficiency
Discipline
Accounting | Portfolio and Security Analysis
Research Areas
Financial Intermediation and Information
Publication
Accounting Review
Volume
91
Issue
2
First Page
513
Last Page
534
ISSN
0001-4826
Identifier
10.2308/accr-51151
Publisher
American Accounting Association
Citation
HUGON, Artur; KUMAR, Alok; and An-Ping LIN.
Analysts, Macroeconomic News, and the Benefit of Active In-House Economists. (2016). Accounting Review. 91, (2), 513-534.
Available at: https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soa_research/1495
Copyright Owner and License
Authors
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 International License.
Additional URL
https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-51151