Publication Type

PhD Dissertation

Version

publishedVersion

Publication Date

6-2025

Abstract

In response to declining R&D productivity and successive patent cliffs, pharmaceutical companies are increasingly acquiring biotechnology firms to sustain innovation. These acquisitions often occur under conditions of competence-destroying change, where the acquirer's chemistry-based knowledge base does not overlap with the biotechnology expertise of the target, challenging traditional theories that emphasize absorptive capacity and knowledge similarity.
This study introduces therapeutic knowledge, defined as the acquirer’s expertise in specific disease areas, as a distinct and critical dimension that interacts with both chemistry-based and biotechnology-based knowledge. Using a dataset of 212 observations across therapeutic areas from 80 acquisitions, the analysis uncovers an inverted U-shaped relationship between therapeutic knowledge strength and post-acquisition innovation outcomes. Acquisitions in therapeutic areas where the acquirer holds moderate knowledge strength produce the highest patent and citation performance. In contrast, acquisitions in weak or strong therapeutic areas yield diminished returns due to, respectively, low absorptive capacity and excessive knowledge redundancy.

Degree Awarded

Business Administration

Discipline

Strategic Management Policy | Technology and Innovation

Supervisor(s)

GOMULYA, David Matius

First Page

1

Last Page

87

Publisher

Singapore Management University

City or Country

Singapore

Copyright Owner and License

Author

Available for download on Thursday, February 26, 2026

Share

COinS